Skip to content

InfoVaticana reports the Pope’s surgeon accurately: no clinical reason to cancel the Latin America trip

InfoVaticana relays Vatican News’s interview with Professor Stefano Margaritora, who operated on Leo XIV: no clinical reason the November trip should not go ahead, about ten more days to full recovery, and a routine removal of the lower lobe of the right lung. The report matches the interview.

By TradWatch™ staff

2 min read

Share this piece

Verdicts at a glance

  1. Accurate

    The Pope’s surgeon said there is no clinical reason the long trip planned for November cannot take place. · InfoVaticana

In this brief · 7 sections
  1. 01What was said
  2. 02Context
  3. 03The record
  4. 04Bottom line
  5. 05The original
  6. 06Sources
  7. 07Corrections

On 18 October 2026 InfoVaticana reported Vatican News’s interview with Professor Stefano Margaritora, the thoracic surgeon at Rome’s Gemelli hospital who operated on Leo XIV on 13 October. The interview, published on 17 October, is the source for every point in the report, so TradWatch™ set the two side by side.

What was said

The statement under review, quoted verbatim, with a link to the moment it was made.

Statement 1: InfoVaticana

InfoVaticana · October 18, 2026

desde el punto de vista médico, «no hay motivos clínicos por los que no se pueda realizar» un viaje largo y con desplazamientos en avión como el programado para noviembre

— InfoVaticana, InfoVaticana

In brief: The Pope’s surgeon said there is no clinical reason the long trip planned for November cannot take place.

Our verdict: AccurateThe record supports the claim as stated.

See the record
El cirujano de León XIV habla sobre su viaje a América: «No hay motivos médicos que lo impidan»infovaticana.com

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with InfoVaticana. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Context

Leo XIV left Gemelli hospital and returned to the Vatican on 17 October.

The record

What the sources show, statement by statement.

Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.
1

Statement 1 · InfoVaticana

The Pope’s surgeon said there is no clinical reason the long trip planned for November cannot take place.

  1. Verifiable fact

    It matches the interview

    In the Vatican News interview, Professor Margaritora says that for “a long trip involving air travel in about three weeks, I would say there are no clinical reasons why it should not take place”; Vatican News gives the trip’s dates as 6–17 November. He also says the lower lobe of the right lung was removed in a routine operation without complications, that full recovery should take “another ten days or so”, and that this is, as far as he knows, the first time in modern history a pope has had surgery for a malignant tumour, all as InfoVaticana reports.

    Source

    • 2

      Official Church source

      Pope’s surgeon: No clinical reason to cancel visit to South America

      Vatican News · October 17, 2026

      Read source

  2. TradWatch analysis

    A medical view, not the schedule

    InfoVaticana rightly notes that this is the surgeon’s clinical judgement, not an official confirmation of the trip by the Holy See.

    Source

    • 2

      Official Church source

      Pope’s surgeon: No clinical reason to cancel visit to South America

      Vatican News · October 17, 2026

      Read source

Bottom line

InfoVaticana’s report matches the Vatican News interview: the surgeon sees no clinical reason the November trip should not go ahead and expects full recovery in about ten more days.

The original

The full episode we checked, as InfoVaticana published it.
El cirujano de León XIV habla sobre su viaje a América: «No hay motivos médicos que lo impidan»InfoVaticana · Opens the original

Sources

2 sources: 1 primary source, 1 Church source. Every source is linked; where pages may change we link an archived copy.

Corrections & updates

We fix errors openly. Every change is dated here and in our corrections log.

No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.

Help us keep the record straight

If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.

Share this analysis