Skip to content

Return to Tradition doubts the Third Secret was published in full; the record it relies on is second-hand

On the anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun, Return to Tradition says the 2000 text of the Third Secret of Fatima was not the real or complete secret, and that churchmen who saw it spoke of an apostasy “led from the top”. The Holy See, Sister Lucia and Benedict XVI said otherwise, and the key quotations come through intermediaries.

By TradWatch™ staff

4 min read

Share this piece

Verdicts at a glance

  1. Unsupported

    The text of the Third Secret published in 2000 was not the real secret, or not all of it. · Anthony Stine

  2. Needs context

    Bishops and cardinals who had read the secret all said it describes an apostasy in the Church led from the top. · Anthony Stine

In this brief · 7 sections
  1. 01What was said
  2. 02Context
  3. 03The record
  4. 04Bottom line
  5. 05The original
  6. 06Sources
  7. 07Corrections

On 13 October 2026, the anniversary of the Miracle of the Sun, Return to Tradition published “Vatican Officials Tried Leaking The Third Secret Of Fatima And No One Listened” (podcast). Anthony Stine reads from a LifeSiteNews article listing churchmen said to have hinted at the secret’s contents. Two of his statements can be checked.

What was said

The 2 statements under review, quoted verbatim, with a link to the moment each was made.

Statement 1: Anthony Stine

Return to Tradition · October 13, 2026

at 0:48–1:03

I do not buy for a second that what we got in 2005 or 2000 was the actual third secret of Fatima or at least not a complete reading of it

— Anthony Stine, Return to Tradition

In brief: The text of the Third Secret published in 2000 was not the real secret, or not all of it.

Our verdict: UnsupportedNo evidence was offered, and we found none to support it.

See the record
Vatican Officials Tried Leaking The Third Secret Of Fatima And No One Listenedpodcasters.spotify.com · at 0:48–1:03

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Statement 2: Anthony Stine

Return to Tradition · October 13, 2026

at 1:12–1:32

a number of bishops Cardinals who had been in the room as well as some of the parades some of their experts They're skilled secretaries basically who had been in the room all said the same thing That the third secret of Fatima details an apostasy in the church led from the top

— Anthony Stine, Return to Tradition

In brief: Bishops and cardinals who had read the secret all said it describes an apostasy in the Church led from the top.

Our verdict: Needs contextThe words are accurate, but missing context changes how they read.

See the record
Vatican Officials Tried Leaking The Third Secret Of Fatima And No One Listenedpodcasters.spotify.com · at 1:12–1:32

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Context

The authenticity and completeness of the 2000 publication have been disputed in traditionalist circles for over two decades, notably by The Fatima Center. The Church does not require Catholics to believe in private revelations, Fatima included.

On statement 1 · Anthony Stine

He says one reason is that churchmen who saw the secret described an apostasy, while the published vision shows a scene of persecution and martyrdom.

On statement 2 · Anthony Stine

The episode then reads quotations attributed to Cardinal Silvio Oddi, Cardinal Mario Luigi Ciappi, Bishop Alberto Cosme do Amaral and, through Fr Gabriele Amorth, St Padre Pio.

The record

What the sources show, statement by statement.

Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.
1

Statement 1 · Anthony Stine

The text of the Third Secret published in 2000 was not the real secret, or not all of it.

  1. Verifiable fact

    What the Holy See published

    The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith published the text in June 2000 and said “There is only one manuscript, which is here reproduced photostatically.” Its account of a meeting on 27 April 2000 says that when shown the envelope, Sister Lucia said “This is my letter”, and while reading it, “This is my writing” (The Message of Fatima).

    Source

  2. Verifiable fact

    Benedict XVI on the question

    In May 2016, answering reports that he had called the publication incomplete, the Holy See Press Office said Benedict XVI “confirms decisively that ‘the publication of the Third Secret of Fatima is complete’” and called the remarks attributed to him “pure inventions, absolutely untrue” (EWTN News).

    Source

    • 3

      Journalism

      Vatican: recent stories about Benedict XVI and Fatima secrets are ‘absolutely untrue’

      EWTN News · May 21, 2016

      Read source

2

Statement 2 · Anthony Stine

Bishops and cardinals who had read the secret all said it describes an apostasy in the Church led from the top.

  1. Verifiable fact

    Only one quotation says “from the top”

    Of the statements read in the episode, only the one attributed to Cardinal Ciappi speaks of an apostasy that “will begin at the top”. The episode describes it as a communication to a professor in Salzburg and cites no text from Ciappi himself. The words attributed to Cardinal Oddi speak of “apostasy in the church”, and those of Bishop Amaral say the secret’s content “concerns only our faith” (quotations read at 03:20–07:16).

    Source

    • 1

      Primary source

      Vatican Officials Tried Leaking The Third Secret Of Fatima And No One Listened

      Return to Tradition · October 13, 2026

      Read source

  2. Verifiable fact

    Who is recorded as reading it

    The Holy See’s account names those who opened the envelope before 2000: John XXIII in 1959, Paul VI with Archbishop Angelo Dell’Acqua in 1965, and John Paul II after 1981, with Cardinal Franjo Šeper and Archbishop Eduardo Martínez Somalo handling it (The Message of Fatima). Neither Cardinal Oddi nor Cardinal Ciappi is named.

    Source

  3. TradWatch analysis

    Possible, but not shown

    Second-hand reports from respected churchmen are a reason people find the question open, and some of them were close to the popes concerned. But reported conversations are not the text, and the people the Holy See names as having handled the secret, including Benedict XVI, said the publication was complete.

    Sources

    • 2

      Official Church source

      The Message of Fatima (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, 26 June 2000)

      Holy See (vatican.va) · June 26, 2000

      More analyses citing Message FatimaRead source

    • 3

      Journalism

      Vatican: recent stories about Benedict XVI and Fatima secrets are ‘absolutely untrue’

      EWTN News · May 21, 2016

      Read source

Bottom line

The Holy See, Sister Lucia and Benedict XVI all said the 2000 publication was the complete secret. The claim that churchmen who saw it “all said” it foretold an apostasy “from the top” rests on one second-hand quotation, attributed to a cardinal the Holy See does not list among those who handled the text.

The original

The full video we checked, as Return to Tradition published it. It plays in the platform's own player; nothing loads until you press play.

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Open on YouTube

Sources

3 sources: 1 primary source, 1 Church source, 1 news report. Every source is linked; where pages may change we link an archived copy.

Corrections & updates

We fix errors openly. Every change is dated here and in our corrections log.

No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.

Help us keep the record straight

If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.

Share this analysis