Skip to content

Return to Tradition reads St Vincent of Lérins on doctrine, but gets his century and the Catechisms wrong

Discussing a passage Bishop Joseph Strickland shared from St Vincent of Lérins, Return to Tradition says Vincent wrote in the fourth century, that the Church was “always pro capital punishment”, and that the Catechism of Trent alone was declared “close to infallible”. Vincent wrote in 434, the death-penalty question is contested, and no catechism carries that status.

By TradWatch™ staff

4 min read

Share this piece

Verdicts at a glance

  1. Inaccurate

    St Vincent of Lérins wrote the Commonitorium in the fourth century, at the time of the Arian heresy. · Anthony Stine

  2. Needs context

    Vincent’s rule settles the death-penalty question, because the Church always supported capital punishment. · Anthony Stine

  3. Unsupported

    The Catechism of the Council of Trent alone was declared nearly infallible. · Anthony Stine

In this brief · 7 sections
  1. 01What was said
  2. 02Context
  3. 03The record
  4. 04Bottom line
  5. 05The original
  6. 06Sources
  7. 07Corrections

On 11 October 2026 Return to Tradition released “Bishop Strickland Speaks On Resisting Lawful Church Authority” as a podcast and on YouTube (podcast; YouTube). Anthony Stine reads a passage that Bishop Joseph Strickland shared from St Vincent of Lérins’s Commonitorium on the development of doctrine, then reads further chapters and comments. Bishop Strickland’s excerpt itself is not in question here. Three of the host’s own statements can be checked.

What was said

The 3 statements under review, quoted verbatim, with a link to the moment each was made.

Statement 1: Anthony Stine

Return to Tradition (podcast) · October 11, 2026

at 9:11–9:15

He's saying this in the 4th century, by the way, about like 1st century Christians.

— Anthony Stine, Return to Tradition (podcast)

In brief: St Vincent of Lérins wrote the Commonitorium in the fourth century, at the time of the Arian heresy.

Our verdict: InaccurateThe record contradicts the claim.

See the record
Bishop Strickland Speaks On Resisting Lawful Church Authoritypodcasters.spotify.com · at 9:11–9:15

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition (podcast). Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Statement 2: Anthony Stine

Return to Tradition (podcast) · October 11, 2026

at 14:15–14:20

That is St. Vincent of Lérins answering the capital punishment question, because the church was always pro capital punishment

— Anthony Stine, Return to Tradition (podcast)

In brief: Vincent’s rule settles the death-penalty question, because the Church always supported capital punishment.

Our verdict: Needs contextThe words are accurate, but missing context changes how they read.

See the record
Bishop Strickland Speaks On Resisting Lawful Church Authoritypodcasters.spotify.com · at 14:15–14:20

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition (podcast). Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Statement 3: Anthony Stine

Return to Tradition (podcast) · October 11, 2026

at 10:47–10:53

The Catechism of Trent was the only one declared to be close to infallible, the only one.

— Anthony Stine, Return to Tradition (podcast)

In brief: The Catechism of the Council of Trent alone was declared nearly infallible.

Our verdict: UnsupportedNo evidence was offered, and we found none to support it.

See the record
Bishop Strickland Speaks On Resisting Lawful Church Authoritypodcasters.spotify.com · at 10:47–10:53

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition (podcast). Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Context

St Vincent’s rule that doctrine may develop only “in the same doctrine, the same sense, and the same understanding” is part of the Church’s own teaching: the First Vatican Council quoted it in Dei Filius (Dei Filius, ch. 4).

On statement 1 · Anthony Stine

Later the host adds that Vincent was “writing this at the time of the Aryan heresy in the fourth century” ([11:56]).

On statement 2 · Anthony Stine

The host is reading Vincent’s rule that a Catholic must believe what was held “by all, equally with one consent”.

On statement 3 · Anthony Stine

The host recommends the Catechism of St Pius X and says some Catholics treat the current Catechism as if it were infallible.

The record

What the sources show, statement by statement.

Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.
1

Statement 1 · Anthony Stine

St Vincent of Lérins wrote the Commonitorium in the fourth century, at the time of the Arian heresy.

  1. Verifiable fact

    Vincent dates his own book

    In the Commonitorium Vincent refers to “the holy council which some three years ago was held at Ephesus”, which met in 431 (Commonitorium, ch. 29). The Catholic Encyclopedia dates the work to 434 (Catholic Encyclopedia). It belongs to the fifth century. Vincent discusses the Arian crisis of the previous century as an example; he did not write during it.

    Sources

    • 2

      Primary source

      ch. 29

      Commonitorium (St Vincent of Lérins)

      New Advent

      Read source

    • 3

      Historical

      St. Vincent of Lérins

      Catholic Encyclopedia (New Advent)

      Read source

2

Statement 2 · Anthony Stine

Vincent’s rule settles the death-penalty question, because the Church always supported capital punishment.

  1. Verifiable fact

    What earlier teaching said

    The Catechism of the Council of Trent taught that civil authorities have lawful “power over life and death”, and that its just use is “an act of paramount obedience” to the fifth commandment (Roman Catechism). That teaching described a lawful power, not a duty. John Paul II, keeping it, judged cases requiring execution “very rare, if not practically non-existent” (Evangelium Vitae 56).

    Sources

  2. Verifiable fact

    How the Holy See presents the change

    Since 2018 the Catechism teaches that “the death penalty is inadmissible” (CCC 2267). The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith called the revision “an authentic development of doctrine that is not in contradiction with the prior teachings of the Magisterium” (CDF letter, n. 8).

    Sources

  3. TradWatch analysis

    A real debate, stated as settled

    Whether the 2018 revision is a true development in Vincent’s sense is argued in good faith on both sides. The host’s view is one side of it. But “always pro capital punishment” flattens a teaching that allowed the penalty without requiring it, and the Holy See applies the same rule of development to reach the opposite conclusion. TradWatch™ examined a similar claim in a LifeSiteNews report.

3

Statement 3 · Anthony Stine

The Catechism of the Council of Trent alone was declared nearly infallible.

  1. Verifiable fact

    How the current Catechism was approved

    John Paul II declared the Catechism of the Catholic Church “a valid and legitimate instrument for ecclesial communion and a sure norm for teaching the faith” (Fidei depositum).

    Source

  2. TradWatch analysis

    No catechism has that status

    Popes have commended the Roman Catechism highly, but the episode cites no act of the Church declaring it “close to infallible”, and we found none. Infallibility belongs to definitions of the Pope and councils, not to catechisms as such. Each catechism carries the authority of the teaching it contains.

Bottom line

The episode reads St Vincent accurately, and his rule on development is the Church’s own. But Vincent wrote in 434, not the fourth century; no catechism has been declared “close to infallible”; and “always pro capital punishment” is one side of a debate the Holy See answers differently.

The original

The full video we checked, as Return to Tradition published it. It plays in the platform's own player; nothing loads until you press play.

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Return to Tradition. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Open on YouTube

Sources

9 sources: 2 primary sources, 6 Church sources, 1 historical source. Every source is linked; where pages may change we link an archived copy.
  1. 9.
    Official Church sourceFurther reading

    First Vatican Council, Dei Filius (1870)

    Papal Encyclicals Online

    papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum20.htm

Corrections & updates

We fix errors openly. Every change is dated here and in our corrections log.

No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.

Help us keep the record straight

If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.

Share this analysis