Topics: The death penalty
Is denying the death penalty’s permissibility heresy? Checking a LifeSiteNews report on the Holy See at the UN
Reporting the Holy See’s call at the UN for abolition, LifeSiteNews says the death penalty is “mandated by divine law” and that denying its permissibility is at least material heresy. The sources it cites speak of a lawful power, not a mandate, and the Church has not defined the point.
By TradWatch™ staff
5 min read
Verdicts at a glance
- Misleading
The death penalty is mandated by divine law, and denying its permissibility is at least material heresy. · LifeSiteNews
- Mostly accurate
Leo XIV said Catholics who support the death penalty cannot be considered genuinely pro-life. · LifeSiteNews
In this brief · 7 sections
On 9 October 2026 LifeSiteNews reported that Archbishop Christophe El-Kassis, the Holy See’s Permanent Observer to the United Nations, had urged a moratorium on executions as a step toward abolishing the death penalty worldwide. The report’s account of the address is not in question here. Its closing paragraphs make two further claims: one about Pope Leo XIV, and one about what Catholic doctrine requires.
What was said
Statement 1: LifeSiteNews
LifeSiteNews · October 9, 2026
In other words, the death penalty is mandated by divine law; anyone who denies its permissibility is – at least materially – a heretic, since he denies an article of divine law.
In brief: The death penalty is mandated by divine law, and denying its permissibility is at least material heresy.
Our verdict: MisleadingContains some truth but leaves a false impression.
See the record for statement 1This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with LifeSiteNews. Views quoted are those of the speaker.
Statement 2: LifeSiteNews
LifeSiteNews · October 9, 2026
Following his election, Pope Leo XIV reaffirmed this abolitionist trajectory, explicitly asserting that Catholics who support the death penalty cannot be considered genuinely “pro-life.”
In brief: Leo XIV said Catholics who support the death penalty cannot be considered genuinely pro-life.
Our verdict: Mostly accurateBroadly supported, but a detail is off or overstated.
See the record for statement 2This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with LifeSiteNews. Views quoted are those of the speaker.
Context
The Catechism was revised in 2018, with the Pope’s approval, to teach that the death penalty is “inadmissible”; the Church “works with determination for its abolition worldwide” (CCC 2267).
On statement 1 · LifeSiteNews
The sentence closes the article. It follows a paragraph citing Romans 13:4, St Thomas Aquinas and the Catechism of the Council of Trent, which the article says taught that judges carrying out lawful capital sentences obey the Fifth Commandment.
On statement 2 · LifeSiteNews
The sentence comes in the article’s summary of the 2018 Catechism revision.
The record
What the sources show, statement by statement.
Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.Statement 1 · LifeSiteNews
The death penalty is mandated by divine law, and denying its permissibility is at least material heresy.
Verifiable fact The Roman Catechism speaks of a lawful power, not a mandate
The Catechism of the Council of Trent says that “another kind of lawful slaying belongs to the civil authorities, to whom is entrusted power of life and death”, and that “the just use of this power, far from involving the crime of murder, is an act of paramount obedience to this Commandment” (Roman Catechism, Fifth Commandment). The article reports this accurately. But the text describes what the state may do, not what it must do. Pope John Paul II, while keeping that teaching, judged that cases requiring execution are “very rare, if not practically non-existent” (Evangelium Vitae 56).
Verifiable fact How the Church defines heresy
Canon law defines heresy as “the obstinate denial or obstinate doubt… of some truth which is to be believed by divine and Catholic faith”, meaning a truth “proposed as divinely revealed either by the solemn magisterium of the Church or by its ordinary and universal magisterium” (CIC cann. 750–751). The Holy See has not declared the permissibility of capital punishment to be such a truth. In 2018 the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith described the revised Catechism text as “an authentic development of doctrine that is not in contradiction with the prior teachings of the Magisterium” (CDF letter, n. 8). The Catechism now teaches that “the death penalty is inadmissible” (CCC 2267).
Sources
- 4
Official Church source
CIC cann. 750–751
Code of Canon Law, Book III
Holy See (vatican.va)
- 5
Official Church source
n. 8
Letter to the Bishops regarding the new revision of number 2267 of the Catechism on the death penalty
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (vatican.va) · August 1, 2018
- 6
Official Church source
CCC 2267
Catechism of the Catholic Church, nn. 2263–2267
Holy See (vatican.va)
More analyses citing Catechism of the Catholic ChurchRead source
- 4
TradWatch analysis A live debate, stated as a settled charge
Whether the 2018 revision can be reconciled with earlier teaching is a serious question, and Catholic theologians argue it on both sides. LifeSiteNews is entitled to its view. But “mandated” overstates the sources the article itself cites, which speak of a lawful power. And a charge of heresy, even “material” heresy, against Catholics who follow the current Catechism rests on a doctrinal status the Church has not given this teaching.
Sources
- 2
Historical
Roman Catechism, Part III, Fifth Commandment
The Catechism of the Council of Trent: the Fifth Commandment
Catholic Information Network (McHugh–Callan translation)
- 4
Official Church source
CIC cann. 750–751
Code of Canon Law, Book III
Holy See (vatican.va)
- 5
Official Church source
n. 8
Letter to the Bishops regarding the new revision of number 2267 of the Catechism on the death penalty
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (vatican.va) · August 1, 2018
- 2
Statement 2 · LifeSiteNews
Leo XIV said Catholics who support the death penalty cannot be considered genuinely pro-life.
Verifiable fact What Leo XIV said
Speaking to reporters at Castel Gandolfo on 30 September 2025, Leo XIV said: “Someone who says I am against abortion but says I am in favor of the death penalty is not really pro-life.” He added: “They are very complex issues… I don’t know if anyone has all the truth on them”, and asked for “greater respect for one another” (America; AP via PBS).
TradWatch analysis Close, but without the caveat
LifeSiteNews’s paraphrase captures the substance of the remark. It was an informal answer to reporters, though, not a formal teaching act, and the Pope paired it with an acknowledgement that the questions are complex. Hence “mostly accurate”.
Source
Bottom line
The report’s account of the UN address and of Leo XIV’s 2025 remark holds up, although it leaves out the Pope’s caveat. Its closing claim does not. The Roman Catechism calls capital punishment lawful, not mandatory. And the Church has not proposed its permissibility as a truth of faith, the condition canon law sets for heresy.
The original
Sources
- 1.Primary sourceCited in statement 1
Holy See urges global abolition of the death penalty at UN
LifeSiteNews · October 9, 2026
lifesitenews.com/news/holy-see-urges-global-abolition-of-the-death-penalty-at-u…
- 2.HistoricalCited in statement 1
Roman Catechism, Part III, Fifth Commandment — The Catechism of the Council of Trent: the Fifth Commandment
Catholic Information Network (McHugh–Callan translation)
- 3.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
EV 56 — Evangelium Vitae
Holy See (vatican.va) · March 25, 1995
vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_…
- 4.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
CIC cann. 750–751 — Code of Canon Law, Book III
Holy See (vatican.va)
vatican.va/archive/cod-iuris-canonici/eng/documents/cic_lib3-cann747-755_en.html
- 5.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (vatican.va) · August 1, 2018
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_2018080…
- 6.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
CCC 2267 — Catechism of the Catholic Church, nn. 2263–2267
Holy See (vatican.va)
- 7.JournalismCited in statement 2
Pope Leo on Sen. Durbin, abortion and immigration
America · September 30, 2025
americamagazine.org/news/2025/09/30/pope-leo-sen-durbin-abortion-immigration-cu…
- 8.JournalismCited in statement 2
Someone against abortion but in favor of death penalty 'is not really pro-life,' Pope Leo says
Associated Press (via PBS NewsHour) · October 1, 2025
pbs.org/newshour/world/someone-against-abortion-but-in-favor-of-death-penalty-i…
Corrections & updates
No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.
Help us keep the record straight
If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.
More analysis
- Papal-critique and 'resistance' mediaBishop Schneider’s ‘hostile takeover’ warning: what was said, and what can be checkedAt the Catholic Identity Conference, Bishop Athanasius Schneider said a ‘hostile takeover’ within the Church’s administrative structure is marked by ‘brazen heresies’ among senior clergy. The reported excerpts name no examples, which limits what can be tested. · 8 min read
- Liturgy law: from the 1984 indult to Traditionis custodesPittsburgh's unauthorized Latin Mass: the Sunday obligation, and what Quo Primum can and can't doThe Diocese of Pittsburgh says a Latin Mass it didn't authorize does not fulfil the Sunday obligation; LifeSiteNews says Quo Primum makes the old Mass permanently free to celebrate. Both claims need context from canon law. · 5 min read
- The SSPX episcopal consecrations of 2026Most priests on the SSPX’s new list joined before the excommunications, not afterLifeSiteNews says the excommunications have “backfired”, with the SSPX listing priests who “just joined” it. The Society’s list mostly shows priests who joined earlier or are drawing closer. Only two of its dated cases come after the July decree. · 2 min read