Skip to content

The Pillar says the Vatican’s canon-law office has contradicted the DDF on SSPX confessions and marriages. The reply it cites is unpublished and speaks only of marriages

The Pillar argues that the doctrinal dicastery’s July statement that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid looks “simply wrong” after a reported reply from the Dicastery for Legislative Texts. Its account of the faculties is largely right, but the reply is known only from a passage on marriages quoted by one French website, and the article miscounts the bishops excommunicated and misdates the confession faculty.

By TradWatch™ staff

4 min read

Share this piece

Verdicts at a glance

  1. Needs context

    The Dicastery for Legislative Texts has in effect found the DDF wrong to say that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid. · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

  2. Inaccurate

    Five SSPX bishops were declared excommunicated: the consecrator and the four men consecrated. · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

  3. Mostly accurate

    The faculty to hear confessions came from a 2017 papal decree, so only the Pope can withdraw it. · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

In this brief · 7 sections
  1. 01What was said
  2. 02Context
  3. 03The record
  4. 04Bottom line
  5. 05The original
  6. 06Sources
  7. 07Corrections

On 21 October 2026 The Pillar asked whether confessions heard and marriages witnessed by priests of the Society of St. Pius X are still valid after the July excommunications. It argues that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s statement that they are invalid looks wrong, citing a reported reply from the Dicastery for Legislative Texts, the office that interprets canon law.

What was said

The 3 statements under review, quoted verbatim, with a link to the moment each was made.

Statement 1: The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

The Pillar · October 21, 2026

But the appearance for the moment is that the DDF’s statement about the invalidity of SSPX confessions and marriages is, canonically speaking, simply wrong — at least according to the Vatican’s own authoritative canonical body.

— The Pillar (Ed. Condon), The Pillar

In brief: The Dicastery for Legislative Texts has in effect found the DDF wrong to say that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid.

Our verdict: Needs contextThe words are accurate, but missing context changes how they read.

See the record
Are SSPX confessions and weddings still valid?pillarcatholic.com

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with The Pillar. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Statement 2: The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

The Pillar · October 21, 2026

The Vatican declared in July the excommunication of five SSPX bishops for participation in an illicit episcopal consecration; one was the bishop who performed the consecration, and the other four the men who received the sacrament.

— The Pillar (Ed. Condon), The Pillar

In brief: Five SSPX bishops were declared excommunicated: the consecrator and the four men consecrated.

Our verdict: InaccurateThe record contradicts the claim.

See the record
Are SSPX confessions and weddings still valid?pillarcatholic.com

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with The Pillar. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Statement 3: The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

The Pillar · October 21, 2026

since the 2017 decree granting them faculties is a formal act of papal governance, and as such can only be amended or withdrawn by another direct act of the pope.

— The Pillar (Ed. Condon), The Pillar

In brief: The faculty to hear confessions came from a 2017 papal decree, so only the Pope can withdraw it.

Our verdict: Mostly accurateBroadly supported, but a detail is off or overstated.

See the record
Are SSPX confessions and weddings still valid?pillarcatholic.com

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with The Pillar. Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Context

The SSPX consecrated four bishops at Écône on 1 July 2026 without a papal mandate; the decree of excommunication followed on 2 July. Whether confessions and marriages in SSPX chapels are valid turns on faculties, not on the excommunications themselves. The Holy See has not published any further text on the question.

The record

What the sources show, statement by statement.

Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.
1

Statement 1 · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

The Dicastery for Legislative Texts has in effect found the DDF wrong to say that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid.

  1. Verifiable fact

    What the DDF said in July

    The Explanatory Note published with the decree of 2 July 2026 warns that “the sacred ministers of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X administer the sacraments illicitly, and that the sacrament of penance administered by them and marriages assisted by them are invalid” (L’Osservatore Romano).

    Source

    • 2

      Official Church source

      Decree and Note from Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith

      L’Osservatore Romano · July 6, 2026

      Read source

  2. Verifiable fact

    The faculties the July note did not mention

    Pope Francis extended to SSPX priests the faculty to absolve validly “until further provisions are made” (Misericordia et misera 12, 20 November 2016). A 2017 letter of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, approved by the Pope, let local Ordinaries give SSPX priests the faculty to assist at marriages where a diocesan priest could not (letter). The Pillar reports that neither has been formally revoked, and no revocation has been published.

    Sources

    • 3

      Official Church source

      Francis, Apostolic Letter, n. 12

      Misericordia et misera

      Holy See (vatican.va) · November 20, 2016

      More analyses citing Misericordia et MiseraRead source

    • 4

      Official Church source

      Letter of the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” on the faculties for the celebration of marriages of the faithful of the Society Saint Pius X

      Holy See Press Office · April 4, 2017

      Read source

  3. TradWatch analysis

    An unpublished reply, and only about marriages

    The reply is known from Riposte catholique, which dates it 7 August and quotes one passage: the July note’s statement on marriages does not appear to have been approved by the Pope with the intention of revoking the 2017 letter. That passage concerns marriages only; the French site adds that its reasoning could logically extend to confessions. The Pillar itself says it could not confirm the text. On confessions, canonists such as Archbishop Juan Ignacio Arrieta, a former secretary of the same dicastery, have said since July that the faculty stands until the Pope revokes it (InfoVaticana), though Arrieta added that marriages before an SSPX priest without a bishop’s delegation would be invalid. The Pillar’s reading may prove right, but it rests on an unpublished text and on reasoning the reported passage applies only to marriages.

    Sources

    • 5

      Journalism

      Selon le Dicastère pour les textes législatifs les facultés romaines à l’égard de la Fraternité Saint-Pie X n’ont pas été révoquées

      Riposte catholique · 2026-10

      Read source

    • 6

      Journalism

      Arrieta: confessions of the FSSPX would remain valid, but their marriages could be null

      InfoVaticana · July 20, 2026

      Read source

2

Statement 2 · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

Five SSPX bishops were declared excommunicated: the consecrator and the four men consecrated.

  1. Verifiable fact

    Six bishops, including the co-consecrator

    The decree names six: Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and Bishop Bernard Fellay, “respectively principal consecrator and co-consecrator”, and the four newly consecrated bishops (L’Osservatore Romano). The slip does not affect the article’s argument.

    Source

    • 2

      Official Church source

      Decree and Note from Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith

      L’Osservatore Romano · July 6, 2026

      Read source

3

Statement 3 · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)

The faculty to hear confessions came from a 2017 papal decree, so only the Pope can withdraw it.

  1. Verifiable fact

    The confession faculty dates from 2016

    The faculty to absolve was granted by Pope Francis himself in the apostolic letter Misericordia et misera of 20 November 2016 (n. 12), as the article says earlier. The 2017 document is the Ecclesia Dei letter on marriages, which itself cites Misericordia et misera (letter). The article also describes Ecclesia Dei as sitting within the DDF; the commission was closed in 2019 and its tasks given to the doctrinal congregation (motu proprio). The point that a papal act can be withdrawn only by the Pope stands.

    Sources

Bottom line

Needs context: The Pillar describes the faculties accurately, but its conclusion rests on an unpublished reply quoted only on marriages. Two details are wrong: six bishops were excommunicated, not five, and the confession faculty dates from 2016.

The original

The full episode we checked, as The Pillar published it.
Are SSPX confessions and weddings still valild?The Pillar · Opens the original

Sources

7 sources: 1 primary source, 4 Church sources, 2 news reports. Every source is linked; where pages may change we link an archived copy.
  1. 3.
    Official Church sourceCited in statement 1

    Francis, Apostolic Letter, n. 12 — Misericordia et misera

    Holy See (vatican.va) · November 20, 2016

    vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_letters/documents/papa-francesco-lettera-…

Corrections & updates

We fix errors openly. Every change is dated here and in our corrections log.

No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.

Help us keep the record straight

If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.

Share this analysis