The Pillar says the Vatican’s canon-law office has contradicted the DDF on SSPX confessions and marriages. The reply it cites is unpublished and speaks only of marriages
The Pillar argues that the doctrinal dicastery’s July statement that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid looks “simply wrong” after a reported reply from the Dicastery for Legislative Texts. Its account of the faculties is largely right, but the reply is known only from a passage on marriages quoted by one French website, and the article miscounts the bishops excommunicated and misdates the confession faculty.
By TradWatch™ staff
4 min read
Share this piece
Verdicts at a glance
- Needs context
The Dicastery for Legislative Texts has in effect found the DDF wrong to say that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid. · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
- Inaccurate
Five SSPX bishops were declared excommunicated: the consecrator and the four men consecrated. · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
- Mostly accurate
The faculty to hear confessions came from a 2017 papal decree, so only the Pope can withdraw it. · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
In this brief · 7 sections
On 21 October 2026 The Pillar asked whether confessions heard and marriages witnessed by priests of the Society of St. Pius X are still valid after the July excommunications. It argues that the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s statement that they are invalid looks wrong, citing a reported reply from the Dicastery for Legislative Texts, the office that interprets canon law.
What was said
Statement 1: The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
The Pillar · October 21, 2026
But the appearance for the moment is that the DDF’s statement about the invalidity of SSPX confessions and marriages is, canonically speaking, simply wrong — at least according to the Vatican’s own authoritative canonical body.
In brief: The Dicastery for Legislative Texts has in effect found the DDF wrong to say that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid.
Our verdict: Needs contextThe words are accurate, but missing context changes how they read.
See the recordThis content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with The Pillar. Views quoted are those of the speaker.
Statement 2: The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
The Pillar · October 21, 2026
The Vatican declared in July the excommunication of five SSPX bishops for participation in an illicit episcopal consecration; one was the bishop who performed the consecration, and the other four the men who received the sacrament.
In brief: Five SSPX bishops were declared excommunicated: the consecrator and the four men consecrated.
Our verdict: InaccurateThe record contradicts the claim.
See the recordThis content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with The Pillar. Views quoted are those of the speaker.
Statement 3: The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
The Pillar · October 21, 2026
since the 2017 decree granting them faculties is a formal act of papal governance, and as such can only be amended or withdrawn by another direct act of the pope.
In brief: The faculty to hear confessions came from a 2017 papal decree, so only the Pope can withdraw it.
Our verdict: Mostly accurateBroadly supported, but a detail is off or overstated.
See the recordThis content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with The Pillar. Views quoted are those of the speaker.
Context
The SSPX consecrated four bishops at Écône on 1 July 2026 without a papal mandate; the decree of excommunication followed on 2 July. Whether confessions and marriages in SSPX chapels are valid turns on faculties, not on the excommunications themselves. The Holy See has not published any further text on the question.
The record
What the sources show, statement by statement.
Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.Statement 1 · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
The Dicastery for Legislative Texts has in effect found the DDF wrong to say that SSPX confessions and marriages are invalid.
Verifiable fact What the DDF said in July
The Explanatory Note published with the decree of 2 July 2026 warns that “the sacred ministers of the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X administer the sacraments illicitly, and that the sacrament of penance administered by them and marriages assisted by them are invalid” (L’Osservatore Romano).
Source
- 2
Official Church source
Decree and Note from Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith
L’Osservatore Romano · July 6, 2026
- 2
Verifiable fact The faculties the July note did not mention
Pope Francis extended to SSPX priests the faculty to absolve validly “until further provisions are made” (Misericordia et misera 12, 20 November 2016). A 2017 letter of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, approved by the Pope, let local Ordinaries give SSPX priests the faculty to assist at marriages where a diocesan priest could not (letter). The Pillar reports that neither has been formally revoked, and no revocation has been published.
Sources
- 3
Official Church source
Francis, Apostolic Letter, n. 12
Misericordia et misera
Holy See (vatican.va) · November 20, 2016
- 4
Official Church source
Letter of the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei” on the faculties for the celebration of marriages of the faithful of the Society Saint Pius X
Holy See Press Office · April 4, 2017
- 3
TradWatch analysis An unpublished reply, and only about marriages
The reply is known from Riposte catholique, which dates it 7 August and quotes one passage: the July note’s statement on marriages does not appear to have been approved by the Pope with the intention of revoking the 2017 letter. That passage concerns marriages only; the French site adds that its reasoning could logically extend to confessions. The Pillar itself says it could not confirm the text. On confessions, canonists such as Archbishop Juan Ignacio Arrieta, a former secretary of the same dicastery, have said since July that the faculty stands until the Pope revokes it (InfoVaticana), though Arrieta added that marriages before an SSPX priest without a bishop’s delegation would be invalid. The Pillar’s reading may prove right, but it rests on an unpublished text and on reasoning the reported passage applies only to marriages.
Sources
Statement 2 · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
Five SSPX bishops were declared excommunicated: the consecrator and the four men consecrated.
Verifiable fact Six bishops, including the co-consecrator
The decree names six: Bishop Alfonso de Galarreta and Bishop Bernard Fellay, “respectively principal consecrator and co-consecrator”, and the four newly consecrated bishops (L’Osservatore Romano). The slip does not affect the article’s argument.
Source
- 2
Official Church source
Decree and Note from Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith
L’Osservatore Romano · July 6, 2026
- 2
Statement 3 · The Pillar (Ed. Condon)
The faculty to hear confessions came from a 2017 papal decree, so only the Pope can withdraw it.
Verifiable fact The confession faculty dates from 2016
The faculty to absolve was granted by Pope Francis himself in the apostolic letter Misericordia et misera of 20 November 2016 (n. 12), as the article says earlier. The 2017 document is the Ecclesia Dei letter on marriages, which itself cites Misericordia et misera (letter). The article also describes Ecclesia Dei as sitting within the DDF; the commission was closed in 2019 and its tasks given to the doctrinal congregation (motu proprio). The point that a papal act can be withdrawn only by the Pope stands.
Bottom line
Needs context: The Pillar describes the faculties accurately, but its conclusion rests on an unpublished reply quoted only on marriages. Two details are wrong: six bishops were excommunicated, not five, and the confession faculty dates from 2016.
The original
Sources
- 1.Primary sourceCited in statement 1
Are SSPX confessions and weddings still valid?
The Pillar · October 21, 2026
- 2.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
Decree and Note from Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith
L’Osservatore Romano · July 6, 2026
osservatoreromano.va/en/news/2026-07/ing-007/decree-and-note-from-dicastery-for…
- 3.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
Francis, Apostolic Letter, n. 12 — Misericordia et misera
Holy See (vatican.va) · November 20, 2016
vatican.va/content/francesco/en/apost_letters/documents/papa-francesco-lettera-…
- 4.Official Church sourceCited in statement 1
Holy See Press Office · April 4, 2017
press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/en/bollettino/pubblico/2017/04/04/170404d.h…
- 7.Official Church sourceCited in statement 3
Francis, 17 January 2019 — Apostolic Letter issued Motu Proprio on the Pontifical Commission “Ecclesia Dei”
Holy See (vatican.va) · January 17, 2019
vatican.va/content/francesco/en/motu_proprio/documents/papa-francesco-motu-prop…
Corrections & updates
No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.
We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.
Help us keep the record straight
If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.
Share this analysis
More analysis
- The SSPX episcopal consecrations of 2026Who did the 2 July decree excommunicate? Checking a OnePeterFive report against the textOnePeterFive said SSPX bishops and priests were excommunicated but not necessarily the faithful who attend SSPX Masses. On lay people the Vatican’s own texts bear that out; on priests, and on the sacraments, it needs qualifying. · 12 min read
- The SSPX episcopal consecrations of 2026‘Not a schismatic act’? Weighing the jurisdiction argument for the SSPX consecrationsA canon lawyer quoted by LifeSiteNews argued that consecrating bishops without a papal mandate falls short of a ‘perfect schism’ unless there is schismatic intent and a rival jurisdiction. The Holy See applied a different test. · 15 min read
- The SSPX episcopal consecrations of 2026The ‘state of necessity’ case for the SSPX’s 2026 consecrations, set against the Holy See’s recordThe SSPX and its supporters say a crisis in the Church made consecrating bishops without a papal mandate necessary. Here is that argument in their words, and what the Holy See said before and after 1 July. · 17 min read