Skip to content

How available is the traditional Mass? Diane Montagna’s challenge to Cardinal Roche, checked

Diane Montagna disputes Cardinal Roche’s claim, as she reports it, that the traditional Mass is readily available. Diocesan records support her on reduced access; the law itself sits between the two accounts.

By TradWatch™ staff

9 min read

Share this piece

In this brief · 6 sections
  1. 01What was said
  2. 02Context
  3. 03The record
  4. 04Bottom line
  5. 05Sources
  6. 06Corrections

On 29 July 2026 the British Catholic weekly The Tablet published an interview with Cardinal Arthur Roche, prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (The Tablet, free registration required to read in full). He was widely reported as saying that “Pope Leo is not going to change Traditionis Custodes” and is “not going back to Summorum Pontificum” (National Catholic Reporter; Religion News Service). On 31 July Diane Montagna, a Rome-based journalist who writes on the traditional liturgy, answered on her Substack under the headline “More Extraordinary Gaslighting: Cardinal Roche on the Traditional Latin Mass Yet Again” (Substack); The Catholic Thing linked to the piece on 3 August (The Catholic Thing). Her target was not the forecast about Leo but a claim she attributes to Roche: that the older Mass is readily available to Catholics who want it. That claim can be checked against the law and the diocesan record.

What was said

The statement under review, quoted verbatim, with a link to the moment it was made.

Statement 1: Diane Montagna

Diane Montagna (Substack) · July 31, 2026

Cardinal Roche claims that the TLM is readily available and asks, “So, what’s the problem?” His Eminence might pose this question to all those who have lost access to the traditional Roman liturgy, were effectively banished from their parishes, and now have to drive hours on Sunday with their children to attend the TLM

— Diane Montagna, Diane Montagna (Substack)

In brief: Diane Montagna argued that Cardinal Roche’s renewed claim, as she characterises it, that the traditional Mass is readily available ignores Catholics who have lost access to it since 2021, and she described his stance as gaslighting.

See the record
More Extraordinary Gaslighting: Cardinal Roche on the Traditional Latin Mass Yet Againdianemontagna.substack.com

This content is embedded for purposes of commentary, criticism, and news reporting. TradWatch is not affiliated with Diane Montagna (Substack). Views quoted are those of the speaker.

Context

Why this exchange landed when it did

Roche’s interview came four weeks after the Holy See announced, on 2 July, that the bishops involved in the Society of Saint Pius X’s unauthorised consecrations had incurred excommunication. In the weeks between, some U.S. Catholics, among them San Francisco Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone, had called for easier access to the older Mass in response to the rupture (Religion News Service). On 14 August the Holy See published Leo’s letter to Roche, dated 29 June, which stressed “fidelity to the approved texts and instructions” and respect for the rites promulgated by Paul VI and John Paul II; America read it alongside the interview (vatican.va; America). See also liturgy law after Traditionis custodes and Leo XIV and the Latin Mass.

On statement 1 · Diane Montagna

Montagna’s piece, dated “VATICAN CITY, 31 July 2026”, responds to The Tablet’s interview “Work still to do” by Maggie Fergusson. She opens by writing that Roche has “once again claimed” that the traditional liturgy is readily available and that anyone who thinks otherwise is the problem. “Readily available” is her summary. In the passage she quotes from the interview, which the National Catholic Reporter quotes in the same words, Roche says that when he tells such groups the Holy Father “has given you that”, they cannot answer, but that they then say they are still persecuted; he asks, “In what way persecuted?” NCR wrote that Roche “appeared to state” that current conditions do not marginalise Catholics attached to the older Mass. Montagna replies by listing those who, in her account, have lost access: families who now drive hours on Sundays or attend the Society of St. Pius X, couples refused the older rites for weddings or baptisms, newly ordained priests refused permission, and six deacons of the Missionaries of the Divine Mercy in Fréjus-Toulon who, she says, may not be ordained priests in the older rite. Under the subheading “Unbelievable Gaslighting” she argues that Roche and his officials pressed bishops to follow a narrow reading of the motu proprio, that this led to a “worldwide persecution” of the traditional liturgy, and that he will not concede it. She also writes that the results of the bishops’ survey used to justify Traditionis custodes “were falsified”; a leaked report on that survey, obtained by Montagna, surfaced in July 2025 (Crux). That dispute is outside the scope of this brief. The Tablet’s full text is behind a registration wall, so Roche’s words are taken here from the passages quoted by Montagna and NCR.

The record

What the sources show, statement by statement.

Verifiable factcan be checked against the sources cited.TradWatch analysisis our interpretation, clearly labelled.
1

Statement 1 · Diane Montagna

Diane Montagna argued that Cardinal Roche’s renewed claim, as she characterises it, that the traditional Mass is readily available ignores Catholics who have lost access to it since 2021, and she described his stance as gaslighting.

  1. Verifiable fact

    What the law allows, and who must give permission

    The older Mass has not been abolished, but every celebration now depends on a permission. Under Traditionis custodes (16 July 2021) it is the diocesan bishop’s exclusive competence to authorise the 1962 Missal, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See (art. 2); for existing groups he designates places that are not parish churches and is not to authorise new groups (art. 3 §§2 and 6); priests ordained after the motu proprio must apply to the bishop, who consults the Apostolic See (art. 4); and priests already using the older Missal must request permission to continue (art. 5). The Congregation for Divine Worship’s Responsa ad dubia (dated 4 December 2021) said it could allow a parish church only when it is impossible to use another church, oratory or chapel, and that such Masses should not appear in the parish Mass schedule. A rescript dated 20 February 2023 reserved to the Apostolic See, under canon 87 §1, both the use of parish churches and permission for priests ordained after the motu proprio; Montagna’s piece dates this rescript to February 2022. Under Leo, the apostolic nuncio to Great Britain told the bishops of England and Wales on 13 November 2025 that the Pope would not abrogate the motu proprio but would grant bishops who asked a two-year, renewable exemption. A Dicastery official told Catholic News Service the next day that this restated existing practice for permissions to use parish churches (Catholic News Service).

    Sources

    • 2

      Official Church source

      Traditionis custodes arts. 2, 3 §2, 3 §6, 4, 5

      Apostolic Letter issued “Motu proprio” by the Supreme Pontiff Francis “Traditionis custodes” on the use of the Roman Liturgy prior to the Reform of 1970

      Holy See (vatican.va) · July 16, 2021

      Read source

    • 3

      Official Church source

      Responsa ad dubia (4 December 2021), on art. 3 §2

      Responsa ad dubia on certain provisions of the Apostolic Letter Traditionis custodes issued “Motu Proprio” by the Supreme Pontiff Francis (4 December 2021)

      Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (vatican.va) · December 4, 2021

      More analyses citing Responsa ad Dubia Tradizionis CustodesRead source

    • 4

      Official Church source

      Rescriptum ex audientia, 20 February 2023 (CIC can. 87 §1)

      Rescriptum ex audientia SS.mi on the Motu Proprio “Traditionis custodes” (20 February 2023)

      Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (vatican.va) · February 20, 2023

      More analyses citing Rescriptum TraditioniscustodesRead source

    • 5

      Journalism

      Nuncio in Britain says pope won’t overturn restrictions on old Latin Mass

      Catholic News Service (USCCB) · November 14, 2025

      Read source

  2. Verifiable fact

    The diocesan record: fewer venues, unevenly

    In several dioceses the number of venues fell, though unevenly. The National Catholic Register reported in August 2022 that the Diocese of Arlington was reducing its traditional Masses from 21 locations to eight, that the Archdiocese of Washington had limited them from six locations to three non-parish churches, and that the Diocese of Savannah had limited them to one weekly and three monthly locations. The same report cited an online tracker that counted, among 98 U.S. dioceses that had responded by then, 72 that had left the Mass in place, 23 that had imposed some restrictions and three that had suppressed it. In Charlotte, Bishop Peter Jugis announced in December 2023 that four parish churches had Vatican permission to continue until 2 October 2025 and that five other parishes must stop, while mission churches and non-parochial chapels already offering it were not affected (Catholic News Herald). His successor, Bishop Michael Martin, ended the Mass in parish churches and from October 2025 allowed it only at a single chapel in Mooresville; CNA reported that he recognised the chapel was too small for all regular attendees and that many would have to drive long distances (Diocese of Charlotte; CNA). Pew found in 2025 that 13% of U.S. Catholics had attended a Traditional Latin Mass in the past five years and 2% say they attend one at least weekly; its question defined such a Mass as one said entirely in Latin with the priest facing the altar, not by the Missal used, and Pew noted that attendance may have declined because the Mass is less widely available than before Traditionis custodes took effect. The sociologist Stephen Cranney told OSV News, in a report published by America, that the motu proprio had an “immediate impact” in reducing venues (America).

    Sources

    • 6

      Journalism

      ‘Traditionis Custodes,’ One Year Later, Brings New Pastoral Realities and Challenges

      National Catholic Register · August 5, 2022

      Read source

    • 7

      Journalism

      Bishop Jugis announces changes to Traditional Latin Mass offerings

      Catholic News Herald (Diocese of Charlotte) · December 26, 2023

      Read source

    • 8

      Primary source

      Statement of Bishop Michael Martin, 23 May 2025 (start date later deferred to 2 October 2025)

      Completing the Implementation of Traditionis Custodes in the Diocese of Charlotte

      Diocese of Charlotte · May 23, 2025

      Read source

    • 9

      Journalism

      Charlotte Bishop Restricts Traditional Latin Mass to 1 Chapel

      National Catholic Register (CNA) · September 29, 2025

      Read source

    • 10

      Scientific

      Catholic Communion, confession, devotions and other practices in the US

      Pew Research Center · June 16, 2025

      Read source

    • 11

      Journalism

      5 years after Pope Francis’ Latin Mass restrictions, traditionalist Catholics reflect on ‘Traditionis Custodes’

      America (OSV News) · July 27, 2026

      Read source

  3. TradWatch analysis

    Two meanings of ‘available’, and a charge about intent

    The two sides are partly using one word in two senses. Roche’s quoted words, that the Holy Father “has given you that”, point to legal permission: the older Mass can still be celebrated lawfully. In that sense he is accurate. Montagna means lived access: how far families must travel, whether the Mass is in a parish church, whether young priests may learn and celebrate it, and whether permissions are temporary. On that measure the diocesan record supports her. Access has narrowed in several dioceses and is uneven, and key permissions now pass through Rome. A letter to the French bishops signed by the Secretary of State, Cardinal Pietro Parolin, and reported by Crux on 25 March 2026, said the Pope is attentive to the question and hoped for concrete solutions that generously include those sincerely attached to the older rite while respecting the liturgical orientations of the Second Vatican Council (Crux). That suggests the Holy See, too, sees inclusion as an open pastoral question, at least in France. Two limits apply. Without authoritative national figures on venues, neither side can say how many Catholics lack reasonable access. Cranney told OSV News it is “hard to get solid numbers” on the motu proprio’s effect on attendance (America), and Stephen P. White has warned in The Catholic Thing that Pew’s Latin Mass figures are close to the survey’s margin of error (The Catholic Thing). And “gaslighting” implies knowing manipulation, which no record can show. Montagna’s factual point stands without it.

    Sources

    • 12

      Journalism

      Pope Leo calls for French bishops to ‘generously include’ those attached to Traditional Latin Mass

      Crux · March 25, 2026

      Read source

    • 13

      Journalism

      Is the Traditional Latin Mass Booming?

      The Catholic Thing · June 26, 2025

      Read source

    • 1

      Primary source

      More Extraordinary Gaslighting: Cardinal Roche on the Traditional Latin Mass Yet Again

      Diane Montagna (Substack) · July 31, 2026

      Read source

    • 14

      Journalism

      Vatican liturgy chief says Pope Leo will not overturn Latin Mass restrictions

      National Catholic Reporter · July 30, 2026

      Read sourceArchived copy

    • 11

      Journalism

      5 years after Pope Francis’ Latin Mass restrictions, traditionalist Catholics reflect on ‘Traditionis Custodes’

      America (OSV News) · July 27, 2026

      Read source

Bottom line

On the factual question of lived access, the record supports Montagna’s objection. The traditional Mass remains lawful, as Roche says, but documented diocesan decisions since 2021 reduced and concentrated it, and key permissions now depend on Rome, so the Mass is not readily available in every diocese in the sense Montagna means. The charge of gaslighting goes beyond what the record can show; the factual objection does not need it.

Sources

15 sources: 3 primary sources, 3 Church sources, 1 scientific source, 8 news reports. Every source is linked; where pages may change we link an archived copy.
  1. 3.
    Official Church sourceCited in statement 1

    Responsa ad dubia (4 December 2021), on art. 3 §2 — Responsa ad dubia on certain provisions of the Apostolic Letter Traditionis custodes issued “Motu Proprio” by the Supreme Pontiff Francis (4 December 2021)

    Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (vatican.va) · December 4, 2021

    vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20211204_…

  2. 4.
    Official Church sourceCited in statement 1

    Rescriptum ex audientia, 20 February 2023 (CIC can. 87 §1) — Rescriptum ex audientia SS.mi on the Motu Proprio “Traditionis custodes” (20 February 2023)

    Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments (vatican.va) · February 20, 2023

    vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/ccdds/documents/rc_con_ccdds_doc_20230220_…

  3. 8.
    Primary sourceCited in statement 1

    Statement of Bishop Michael Martin, 23 May 2025 (start date later deferred to 2 October 2025) — Completing the Implementation of Traditionis Custodes in the Diocese of Charlotte

    Diocese of Charlotte · May 23, 2025

    charlottediocese.org/communications/completing-the-implementation-of-traditioni…

  4. 15.
    Primary sourceFurther reading

    Interview by Maggie Fergusson (free registration required) — Work still to do: The Tablet interview with Cardinal Arthur Roche

    The Tablet · July 29, 2026

    thetablet.co.uk/features/work-still-to-do-the-tablet-interview-with-cardinal-ar…Archived copy

Corrections & updates

We fix errors openly. Every change is dated here and in our corrections log.

No corrections have been made to this brief. Spotted an error? Request a correction.

We invite the people and outlets discussed here to respond. Submit a response and we’ll publish it alongside this brief.

Help us keep the record straight

If we’ve made a mistake, tell us — we correct errors openly and log every change. People and outlets we write about can respond, and we publish their replies here.

Share this analysis